Is the Grass Really Greener?

Life presents us with many options, especially when it relates to people and the complexities of attraction (the term attractive is subjective, denoting something different to all of us). Nonetheless, according to Desmond Morris' studies of human behaviour (link: www.desmond-morris.com) humans are commonly attracted to attributes such as facial symmetry, a strong gene pool, and of course, sexual prowess.
Although it may be human nature to be attracted to objects of beauty in various shapes, colours, or forms, it does not suggest that we act on our impulses and/or desires in the attempt to make them our novelties. What makes people feel the need or desire to go elsewhere especially when they are already involved in a relationship that is so comfortably good? The the answer is quite simple: it is a behavioural phenomenon that is intrinsic to human nature - as is our strive for perfection - in that we desire those things that we do not have. For example, people with curly hair want straight hair.
As a hopeless romantic I strongly believe in both exclusivity and monogamy. That being said, I would like to see more marriages work, and, for couples to be able to rave about the strength and longevity of their unions. Furthermore, I believe that two people in love should co-exist in a virtual bubble, creating an impenetrable wall to prevent intruders and wannabe contaminators from entering. There is something quite calming about being in a relationship with that special someone who has seen you at your odious worst; who provides you with the three legs of support (i.e. physical, emotional, and spiritual); who provides you with the reassurance that they will be with you in the good times and the bad; and, who embraces all that you are - somewhere between the person you are and the person you want to be.
This is not to say that all relationships must work. Most of us have been in sex-driven relationships that, like sticks of dynamite once ignited, fizzle out, leaving nothing more than a realization that a true relationship was non-existent. Nevertheless, for some this is all what they want or need.
For those who want, entering into, or already involved in a forward-looking and mutually amicable relationship, it would be wise to avoid confusing vulnerability and complacency of one-self with unhappiness. This is often the case when a couple are living together, someone will feel apprehensive and/or anxious about letting their guard down, afraid that it might expose their true nature and perhaps their deepest and darkest secrets. Consequently, that person may progressively feel even more guarded and edgy....eventually evoking negative feelings (e.g. anger or resentment) for their significant other.
There is an old maxim that I am sure most of you have heard, "better the Devil you know than the Devil you don't know". Unless you met your significant other on false pre-tenses or you have reached the limits of your sanity being with that person, try to validate your feelings by communicating with love and compassion, and every now and again, reminisce about what qualities attracted you to him/her rather than looking for a new field to play on. With this approach, at least you will only be presented with your current relationship issues (most often times, easily resolved) and not a basket of new, unknown issues, that you could be facing in a new relationship.
Focus on what 'is' rather than on what 'is not'.
"...you know when you've found it, that's something I've learned, because you feel it when its taken away"
Lyrics from the song Amie by Damien Rice
17 Comments:
Damn that Damien Rice!!!
You said it, D.
Shout-outs ta ma boyee D-Rice!
Word.
ps: said grass gives me cramps. nausea. bloating. a general malaise, if you will. not that i'm bitter.
just sayin'.
A 'hopeless romantic', that you are!
The problem my dear David is that you are much too intimidating for women in Ottawa. You're smart, very handsome, extremely fit (holy hot body!), kind, generous, and probably one of the most attentive men I have ever met! (Eric is so jelous of you! His face tightens up whenever I bring up your name ;-) )
You must leave Ottawa, David! That place is too small and lame for a guy like you. Toronto is a far better city, there's so much to do, plenty of women to choose from, and opportunities in your field of work. The women here would kill for a guy like you!
:-)xox
ps. thanks for the e-mail!
Blush, blush...
Mel, thanks for the kind words...
Funny, I was actually giving Toronto some thought lately, but I'm not convinced that it will be the better of the two evils. More and more I'm realizing that I need to live somewhere warm 365 days/year. Toronto just seems like an over-sized Ottawa, the difference being a larger population, more private enterprises, but the people may be a bit too cold for my liking - "the city with no soul".
Nice to hear from you.
~D-Rocks
Move to California. You are perfect for Cali / it's perfect for you.
Southern California would be my ideal destination of choice.
You know something J-Money, sometimes I wanna make like Anican and join the Dark Side...but, that's not me.
I think you'd do well in MTL d-rock... that city's got style, and hot girls...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Vector Head,
Had to remove your comment due to possible recourse.
Thanks for your comment.
~D-Rocks
Luke...(Vader-like breathing)...I am your father...
"I'll never join you!!" (girly-ass shriek from Skywalker)
The Dark Side. A dangerous, nasty place. I'm done with it.
California Love, yo.
D-Rocks: You cannot hide forever, Jills.
Jillian: I will not fight it.
D-Rocks: Give yourself to the Dark Side. It is the only way you can save yourself. Yes, your thoughts betray you. Your feelings are strong. Especially for... And, your feelings have betrayed him, too. Now his failure is complete. If you will not turn to the Dark Side, then perhaps he will...
Jillian: [igniting cigarette]
[shouts, interrupting] Never!
(end of part II)
Hey,
Finally read something on your site...just wanted to throw your words back at you.... I like what you wrote and please don't allow yourself to become a cynic... not everybody has the capacity to love wholeheartedly and thus become vulnerable - if you were able to do so once, you will be able to
again when the time is right...it's not a bad thing...hopefully it will be
with someone who is willing to open themselves up in the same magnitude and believes in love and the beauty of a strong relationship. Sometimes people
seek out this vulnerability in their mate to use it to their advantage, to hold power over them (these are not the kind of people we want to be with and I hope I am getting better at spotting them... and others get afraid when they find themselves slipping into the vulnerable zone and feel the
need to walk away, they can't love that deep. When you find yourself in relationships with these type of people you have to realize that it has nothing to do with you, it is thier own insecurities, their incapcity to love.
Don't change your view on love and realtionships - read your own message from time to time.
I think it's interesting that you say "Focus on what 'is' rather than what 'is not'". You have a "blueprint" (to put it in your own words). So, doesn't that kind of mean you only focus on what "is not" in relation to the blueprint when you meet someone? Perhaps you should try and look at people as individuals with all the great potential things that they DO have rather than trying to fit your blueprint and being disappointed because of what "is not". That said - I don't think it's wise to "settle" with someone you know isn't going to give you what you need. So really, I'm full of shit...
Andrea,
I'm somewhat confused with your line of argument.
This particular blog was not written in the context of meeting new people. Rather, it was meant to provide food-for-thought, perhaps even clarity, to those already in relationships who are seeking new playing fields (for the reasons discussed).
Although, I will agree with you in regards to identifying with people who demonstrate 'great potential', I am going to disagree about setting aside the mental blueprint... I believe there should be limitations to what we will accept from the person we intend to share the rest of our lives with, n'est-ce pas?
Andi, you're a star!
Vector Head,
You're much too analytical (I'm one to talk, right?)! Although, I must admit that I do agree with your point of view about the old versus new social acceptability paradigm.
My perspective/views on the ideal relationship is one where there is mutual respect and equality. However, my position of a 'hopeless' romantic (for a lack of a better word), is one of traditional social acceptability, where men are men and women are women, void the feminist shit. Including the adage of being there for each other through the good times and the bad - that kind of 'hopeless'.
Let's just leave the 'helpless romantic' stuff to the tyranny of the weak-minded.
Within that virtual bubble there are two individual bubbles. How these 2 individual bubbles shape or grow defines the overall bubble. If 2 people can grow together that bubble will get stronger.....
There are days when I think myself of living in the warm place but there are days when I realize the happy place exists inside of me. Sometimes it is worth trying new things for the sake of experience and not result.
Post a Comment
<< Home